Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Platinum- Resistant or Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer and Peritoneal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival outcomes and prognostic factors of the patients with recurrent platinumresistant and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), tubal, and peritoneal cancer. METHODS: Women with recurrent platinum-resistant and refractory EOC, tubal and peritoneal cancer who received treatment at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC) between January 2010 and December 2019 were included. Demographic data, serum marker, surgical factors, pathological factors and response of treatment were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier was used to calculate survival outcome. RESULT: Forty patients were recruited in this study (platinum-resistant 24 patients and refractory 16 patients). The median survival times were 19 and 21 months in and platinum-resistant and platinumrefractory patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall survival according to age, comorbidity, tumor grading, primary treatment, and secondary surgery. However, histology of clear cell carcinoma may associate with increased risk of death. The median overall survival of patients with clear cell carcinoma, serous carcinoma, and others were 14.4, 22.9, and 32.2, respectively (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Almost 10 years, the survival rate of the patients in these group has not increased despite new treatments option. Novel strategies should be considered in National policy of the treatment for ovarian cancer in our country.

Primary fallopian tube endometroid carcinoma: A rare case report.

ABSTRACT: Primary fallopian tube carcinoma is an extremely rare tumor accounting for only 0.14-1.8% of genital tract cancers. A 47-year-old female presented with post-menopausal bleeding and heaviness in the lower abdomen. Imaging revealed the right adnexal mass, suggestive of neoplastic origin. She was prepared for surgery. Per-operatively, there was a solid irregular mass, firm to hard in consistency, around 8 × 5 cm involving the whole of the right fallopian tube, and the right ovary appeared normal. Histopathological examination of the specimen showed endometroid adenocarcinoma of the right fallopian tube. Endometroid carcinoma is important to recognize because it carries the best prognosis of all the fallopian tube cancers. The patient underwent surgery, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and was doing well in follow-up.

[Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Metachronous Splenic Metastasis of Fallopian Tube Cancer with Synchronous Rectal Metastasis-A Case Report].

A 59-year-old woman underwent simple abdominal total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, partial omentectomy, and extirpation of intrapelvic disseminated nodules for right fallopian tube cancer with rectal metastasis and peritoneal dissemination as primary debulking surgery(PDS). The histopathological diagnosis was high grade serous carcinoma( HGSC)of the right fallopian tube. After adjuvant chemotherapy with 4 courses of paclitaxel-carboplatin(TC), low anterior resection of the rectum for rectal metastasis and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection were performed as interval debulking surgery(IDS). Histopathologically, lymph node metastasis was detected only in the right obturator lymph node. After adjuvant chemotherapy with 4 courses of TC, bevacizumab maintenance monotherapy was administered. Three years after PDS, laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic metastasis and extirpation of the solitary peritoneal metastases were performed as secondary debulking surgery(SDS). After adjuvant chemotherapy with 4 courses of TC, olaparib maintenance monotherapy was administered. The patient has remained alive without recurrence for 4 years after SDS and for 7 years after PDS. No case of metachronous splenic metastasis from fallopian tube cancer with synchronous rectal metastasis has been reported; however, long-term prognosis may be expected with PDS, IDS and SDS for platinum-sensitive HGSC.

Pretreatment Nutritional Status in Combination with Inflammation Affects Chemotherapy Interruption in Women with Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuing chemotherapy worsens cancer prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nutritional status at the start of chemotherapy and chemotherapy discontinuation in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. One hundred and forty-six patients to whom weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin were administered as postoperative chemotherapy were included. Six courses in 21-day cycles were defined as complete treatment. As nutritional indicators, body mass index, weight change rate, serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, prognostic nutritional index, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) were compared between complete and incomplete treatment groups. Patients were divided into two groups according to CAR. The number of chemotherapy cycles was compared between these two groups. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for covariate adjustment. RESULTS: Several indicators differed between complete and incomplete treatment groups, and among the indicators, CAR had the highest discriminatory ability. The number of chemotherapy cycles was shorter in the high CAR group than in the low CAR group. A high CAR was associated with chemotherapy interruption even after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Based on CAR, nutritional status before chemotherapy is suggested to be associated with the risk of chemotherapy discontinuation.

Comparison of treatment outcomes between first-line chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (Tohoku gynecologic cancer unit: TGCU-RS001 study).

BACKGROUND: Outcomes with and without bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in Japanese-only ovarian cancer patients have not been reported. In this study, we report a retrospective study conducted at the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 453 patients with stage III/IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were divided into two groups: bevacizumab (168 patients) and without bevacizumab (285 patients). The primary endpoint was the rate of platinum-resistant recurrence and the secondary endpoints were the antitumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: The objective response rates for patients with measurable diseases treated with and without bevacizumab were 84.5% and 73.0%, respectively (P = 0.0066). Platinum-resistant recurrence in the groups treated with and without bevacizumab was noted in 31 (18.4%) and 111 (38.6%) patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median progression-free survival for the bevacizumab and without bevacizumab groups was 23 and 15 months, respectively (P = 0.0002), and the median overall survival was not reached and 49 months, respectively (P = 0.0005). Hypertension of grade 3 or higher was observed in 21 patients (12.5%) in the bevacizumab group (P < 0.001), and proteinuria was observed in 18 patients (10.7%) and 1 patient (0.3%) in the bevacizumab and without bevacizumab groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Intestinal perforation was observed in only one patient (0.6%) in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSION: Combination and maintenance with bevacizumab in primary chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer was effective in reducing platinum-resistant recurrence rates and prolonging progression-free and overall survival.

[Real-world clinical data analysis of PARPi as first-line maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer patients].

Objective: The real-world clinical data of patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer) who received first-line maintenance therapy with poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) were retrospectively analyzed, and the prognostic factors were preliminarily explored. Methods: (1) The clinicopathological data and follow-up data of ovarian cancer patients treated with PARPi first-line maintenance therapy from August 2018 (PARPi was launched in China) to December 31, 2021 in Sichuan Cancer Hospital were collected (real-world clinical data). (2) According to the different types of PARPi, real-world clinical data were divided into olaparib group and niraparib group, which were respectively compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of representative domestic and foreign phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trials (RCT), including olaparib as first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 gene mutation (SOLO-1 study), niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy (PRIMA study), and niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy for Chinese advanced ovarian cancer patients (PRIME study). (3) The prognosis of the two groups and the prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: (1) A total of 83 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 51 years (47-57 years), including 75 cases of ovarian cancer, 5 cases of fallopian tube cancer, and 3 cases of primary peritoneal cancer; 5 cases of stage Ⅰ, 9 cases of stage Ⅱ, 55 cases of stage Ⅲ, 12 cases of stage Ⅳ, and 2 cases of unknown stage; neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was performed in 40 cases and non-NACT in 43 cases; 62 cases had no visible residual lesion after surgery (R0), 9 cases had residual disease lesions <1 cm (R1), 8 cases had residual disease lesions ≥1 cm (R2), and 4 cases with unknown postoperative residual disease. Thirty-two cases had PARPi treatment interruption, 40 cases had PARPi reduction, and 1 case terminated treatment due to acute leukemia. Of the 83 patients, 35 were in the olaparib group and 48 were in the niraparib group. The proportion of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (100% and 75%, respectively) and the proportion of BRCA mutant patients (91% and 10%, respectively) in the olaparib group were higher than those in the niraparib group (all P<0.01). (2) Compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the SOLO-1 study, the olaparib group had only 60% (21/35) coincidence rate; compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of PRIMA and PRIME studies, the coincidence rates of niraparib group were only 31% (15/48) and 69% (33/48). The most common reasons for non-compliance were number of chemotherapy courses, histopathological type, and surgical pathological stage. (3) Of the 83 cases received first-line maintenance therapy with PARPi, the median follow-up was 15.9 months (11.3-22.9 months), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 29.7 months (95%CI: 25.9-33.6 months), and the median overall survival was 49.8 months (95%CI: 47.4-52.2 months). Univariate analysis showed that unilateral or bilateral ovarian cancer, efficacy after platinum-containing chemotherapy, presence or absence of measurable lesions at the end of chemotherapy, and total number of chemotherapy courses were significantly associated with PFS (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that unilateral or bilateral ovarian cancer, total number of chemotherapy courses, and efficacy after platinum-containing chemotherapy were independent factors affecting PFS in stage Ⅱ-Ⅳ patients with PARPi first-line maintenance therapy (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Unilateral ovarian cancer, the total number of chemotherapy courses no more than 9, and achieving complete response after platinum-containing chemotherapy before maintenance therapy are independent influencing factors of PFS benefit in patients with PARPi first-line maintenance therapy. Due to the large differences between the patients in real clinical practice and the research subjects of phase Ⅲ RCT, the results of representative retrospective studies still have important clinical reference significance.

Efficacy and Safety of Platinum Rechallenge in Patients With Platinum-resistant Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Ovarian cancer diagnosed with platinum-resistant recurrence has very poor prognosis and single-agent chemotherapy with no cross-resistance to prior chemotherapy is recommended for its treatment. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of platinum rechallenge therapy for once diagnosed with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who had a platinum-free interval (PFI) of at least 6 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 49 patients who received platinum rechallenge therapy for ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who were once diagnosed with platinum-resistant recurrence between January 2010 and March 2021 and evaluated the efficacy and safety of this treatment. In addition, patient background factors were identified, and independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. RESULTS: A complete response was noted in 7 cases, partial response in 21, stable disease in 9, and progressive disease in 10. The response and disease control rates were 55% and 76%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 8.5 months and 35.8 months, respectively. The independent prognostic factor was PFI for OS, and there was no independent prognostic factor for PFS. Seven patients discontinued chemotherapy owing to serious adverse events, including one patient with treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Platinum rechallenge therapy for patients with platinum-resistant recurrence did not cause previously unreported adverse events, and the adverse events were manageable. In addition, high response and disease control rates were observed, as well as long-term OS. Platinum rechallenge therapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer may be a viable treatment option.

Phase Ib Study of Navicixizumab Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase Ib study evaluated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus navicixizumab, a bispecific antiangiogenic antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor and delta-like ligand 4, against platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, nonrandomized, dose-escalation and -expansion study included 44 patients with previously treated, recurrent, platinum-resistant grade 2/3 ovarian cancer. Treatment was intravenous navicixizumab (3 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 0, 7, and 14 of 28-day cycles). The primary and secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of navicixizumab plus paclitaxel. An RNA-based diagnostic panel was retrospectively used to test the hypothesis that tumors with high angiogenesis or immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment (TME) subtypes (biomarker-positive) are more likely to respond to navicixizumab than those with immune-active/-desert TME subtypes (biomarker-negative). RNA expression was analyzed in available pretreatment tumor tissue to classify 33 patients' TME subtypes, and TME panel findings were correlated with tumor response. RESULTS: The dose-escalation cohorts enrolled patients at navicixizumab doses of 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 3) and 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 2); 3 mg/kg was selected for expansion (n = 39). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (6.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4.5%). Pulmonary hypertension occurred in 18.2% (grade 1-2). The overall objective response rate was 43.2% (95% CI, 28.3 to 59.0): 33.3% (95% CI, 17.3 to 52.8) in patients previously treated with bevacizumab, 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1 to 87.2) in bevacizumab-naive patients, and 62% (95% CI, 31.6 to 86.1) in biomarker-positive patients. The median duration of response was 6 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable). CONCLUSION: Navicixizumab plus paclitaxel demonstrated promising clinical activity in bevacizumab-treated and -naive patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, with manageable toxicity.

Eficacia y seguridad de olaparib como terapia de mantenimiento en pacientes con cáncer de ovario, de trompas de falopio, o peritoneal primario, recurrente, sensible a la quimioterapia basada en platino / Efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with primary, recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el que expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de olaparib como terapia de mantenimiento en pacientes con cáncer de ovario, de trompas de Falopio, o peritoneal primario, recurrente, sensible a la quimioterapia basada en platino. Así, el Dr. Miguel Ángel Ticona Castro, médico especialista en oncología del Servicio de Oncología del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de la Red Prestacional Rebagliati, siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016, envió al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI la solicitud de uso por fuera del petitorio del producto farmacéutico olaparib. ASPECTOS GENERALES: En el 2019, en Perú se diagnosticaron aproximadamente 1237 nuevos casos de cáncer de ovario, con 771 muertes atribuidas a la enfermedad (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation 2022). El cáncer de ovario epitelial seroso es la histología que se encuentra con más frecuencia en los cánceres de ovario avanzados, y entre 20 % y 30 % de los cánceres de ovario serosos de alto grado tienen la mutación del gen del cáncer de mama 1 o 2 (BRCA 1/2). El tratamiento estándar para el cáncer de ovario, de trompas de Falopio, o peritoneal primario (en lo sucesivo denominados colectivamente como cáncer de ovario) incluye la cirugía y la quimioterapia basada en platino. A pesar de las altas tasas de respuesta esperadas (75 % al 85 %), la recurrencia es probable en la mayoría de las mujeres. Si esta recurrencia ocurre seis meses o más después de la última quimioterapia basada en platino, los pacientes se clasifican como sensibles al platino. Tras la respuesta a la quimioterapia basada en platino, la estrategia de tratamiento estándar actual a nivel internacional es "observar y esperar" si se vuelve a dar una progresión de la enfermedad (CADTH 2017; Ray-coquard et al. 2020). METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática utilizando las bases de datos PubMed, Cochrane Library y LILACS. Además, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), incluyendo el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), el Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), el Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud de Colombia (IETS), la Comissáo Nacional de Incorporacáo de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), entre otros. Asimismo, se revisó la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA) y páginas web de sociedades especializadas en el manejo del cáncer como la National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), la European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), la American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), y la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM). Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda en las páginas web del registro de ensayos clínicos administrado por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) y de la International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), para identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o cuyos resultados no hayan sido publicados. La búsqueda de literatura se limitó a GPC, ETS, revisiones sistemáticas con metaanálisis de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) y ECA que abordaran la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen. Se incluyeron las publicaciones en inglés y español. Se excluyeron los ensayos clínicos no aleatorizados, los estudios observacionales, las series de casos, los reportes de casos, las cartas al editor, los comentarios, las editoriales y los resúmenes de congresos. Teniendo en cuenta que los datos finales de los estudios SOLO2 y Studyl9 (estudios pivotales de olaparib en cáncer de ovario recurrente) se publicaron recientemente, en marzo de 2021 y octubre de 2018, respectivamente, solo se incluyeron las revisiones sistemáticas con meta-análisis si incluían los datos finales de ambos estudios. En cuanto a las GPC, se priorizaron aquellas que utilizaron sistemas de gradación para el nivel de evidencia y el grado de las recomendaciones brindadas. RESULTADOS: La búsqueda de literatura permitió identificar 13 publicaciones que aportan información de relevancia para fines de la presente actualización: cuatro GPC realizadas por la NCCN (NCCN 2022), la SEOM (Redondo et al. 2021), la ASCO (Tew et al. 2020), y la ESMO (ESMO 2020); cinco ETS elaboradas por el NICE de Inglaterra y Gales (NICE 2020), el IQWiG de Alemania (IQWiG 2018), la CADTH de Canadá (CADTH 2017), el SMC de Escocia (SMC 2016), y la HAS de Francia (HAS 2015); y cuatro publicaciones de ECA: dos publicaciones del ECA de fase II Studyl9 (Ledermann et al. 2012; Friedlander et al. 2018) y dos publicaciones del ECA de fase III SOLO2 (Pujade-lauraine et al. 2017; Poveda et al. 2021). CONCLUSIÓN: Por todo lo expuesto, el IETSI no aprueba el uso de olaparib como terapia de mantenimiento para pacientes con cáncer de ovario, con o sin mutación BRCA, recurrente, sensible a la quimioterapia basada en platino, que hayan recibido al menos 2 líneas previas de quimioterapia basada en platino, con respuesta completa o parcial a su régimen más reciente.

Randomised phase II trial of weekly ixabepilone ± biweekly bevacizumab for platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This multi-center RP2 study assessed activity/safety of ixabepilone + bevacizumab compared to ixabepilone in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Additional objectives were to examine the role of prior bevacizumab and taxanes, and explore class III-ß-tubulin (TUBB3) as a predictive biomarker. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive ixabepilone 20 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 with (IXA + BEV) or without (IXA) bevacizumab 10 mg/kg days 1, 15 every 28 days. Patients were stratified by prior BEV. The primary endpoint was PFS. OS, safety, and ORR served as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 76 evaluable patients who received IXA + BEV (n = 39) compared to IXA (n = 37), the ORR was 33% (n = 13) versus 8% (n = 3)(P = 0.004), durable at 6 months in 37% (n = 14) and 3% (n = 1) (P < 0.001). BEV significantly improved PFS (median:5.5 vs 2.2 months, HR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.55, P < 0.001) and OS (median:10.0 vs 6.0 months, HR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87, P = 0.006). Both regimens were well-tolerated. TUBB3 expression did not predict response. Subgroup analyses revealed minimal effect of prior BEV or taxane resistant/refractory status on response to IXA + BEV. CONCLUSIONS: IXA + BEV is a well-tolerated, effective combination for platinum/taxane-resistant ovarian cancer that extends PFS and likely OS relative to IXA monotherapy. Prior receipt of BEV should not preclude the use of IXA + BEV. TUBB3 is not a predictive biomarker. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT3093155.

A phase IA dose-escalation study of PHI-101, a new checkpoint kinase 2 inhibitor, for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: PHI-101 is an orally available, selective checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) inhibitor. PHI-101 has shown anti-tumour activity in ovarian cancer cell lines and impaired DNA repair pathways in preclinical experiments. Furthermore, the in vivo study suggests the synergistic effect of PHI-101 through combination with PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PHI-101 in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Chk2 inhibitor for Recurrent EpitheliAl periToneal, fallopIan, or oVarian cancEr (CREATIVE) trial is a prospective, multi-centre, phase IA dose-escalation study. Six cohorts of dose levels are planned, and six to 36 patients are expected to be enrolled in this trial. Major inclusion criteria include ≥ 19 years with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal cancer. Also, patients who showed disease progression during platinum-based chemotherapy or disease progression within 24 weeks from completion of platinum-based chemotherapy will be included, and prior chemotherapy lines of more than five will be excluded. The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PHI-101. DISCUSSION: PHI-101 is the first orally available Chk2 inhibitor, expected to show effectiveness in treating recurrent ovarian cancer. Through this CREATIVE trial, DLT and MTD of this new targeted therapy can be confirmed to find the recommended dose for the phase II clinical trial. This study may contribute to developing a new combination regimen for the treatment of ovarian cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04678102 .

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Stage II-IV Epithelial Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide guidance for the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy in women with newly diagnosed stage II-IV epithelial ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were investigated for relevant systematic reviews and phase III trials. Articles focusing on consolidation and maintenance therapies were excluded. RESULTS: For women with potentially resectable disease, primary cytoreductive surgery, followed by six to eight cycles of intravenous three-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin is recommended. For those with a high-risk profile for primary cytoreductive surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be an option. Adjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus three-weekly carboplatin can be considered for women of Japanese descent. In women with stage III or IV disease, the incorporation of bevacizumab concurrent with paclitaxel and carboplatin is not recommended for use as adjuvant therapy unless bevacizumab is continued as maintenance therapy. Intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel can be considered for stage III optimally debulked women who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy with bevacizumab should not be considered as an option for stage II-IV optimally debulked women. DISCUSSION: The recommendations represent a current standard of care that is feasible to implement and valued by both clinicians and patients.

Efficacy and safety of standard of care with/without bevacizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study JGOG3023.

We investigated the efficacy and safety of further bevacizumab therapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer whose disease had progressed after bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. In this multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (JGOG3023), patients were randomized 1:1 to a single-agent chemotherapy alone (either pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [40 or 50 mg/m2 administered intravenously], topotecan [1.25 mg/m2 intravenously], paclitaxel [80 mg/m2 intravenously], or gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2 intravenously]) or single-agent chemotherapy + bevacizumab (15 mg/m2 intravenously). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and response rate according to Gynecological Cancer Intergroup cancer antigen 125 criteria. In total, 103 patients were allocated to chemotherapy (n = 51) or chemotherapy + bevacizumab (n = 52). Median investigator-assessed PFS was 3.1 and 4.0 mo in each group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.90, P = .0082). Median OS was 11.3 and 15.3 mo in each group, respectively (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.38-1.17, P = .1556). Respective ORRs were 13.7% and 25.0% (P = .0599) and response rates were 16.7% and 21.4% (P = .8273). The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs was 42.0% in the chemotherapy group and 54.9% in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab group; AEs were well tolerated, with only 2 and 12 events leading to discontinuation of therapy, respectively. Bevacizumab was effective beyond progressive disease and AEs were manageable. The observed improvement in PFS requires further verification.

Prognostic significance of ethnicity and age in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study.

BACKGROUND: Age and ethnicity are among several factors that influence overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer. The study objective was to determine whether ethnicity and age were of prognostic significance in women enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to front-line therapy. METHODS: Women with advanced stage ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were enrolled in a phase III clinical trial. All women had surgical staging and received adjuvant chemotherapy with one of three regimens. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between OS with age and race/ethnicity among the study participants. RESULTS: One-thousand-eight-hundred-seventy-three women were enrolled in the study. There were 280 minority women and 328 women over the age of 70. Women age 70 and older had a 34% increase risk for death when compared to women under 60 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.16-1.54). Non-Hispanic Black women had a 54% decreased risk of death with the addition of maintenance bevacizumab (HR = 0.46, 95% CI:0.26-0.83). Women of Asian descent had more hematologic grade 3 or greater adverse events and a 27% decrease risk of death when compared to non-Hispanic Whites (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic Black women showed a decreased risk of death with the addition of bevacizumab and patients of Asian ancestry had a lower death rate than all other minority groups, but despite these clinically meaningful improvements there was no statistically significant difference in OS among the groups.

Progestin Significantly Inhibits Carcinogenesis in the Mogp-TAg Transgenic Mouse Model of Fallopian Tube Cancer.

Recent studies suggest that the fallopian tube epithelium (FTE) harbors the precursor for high-grade ovarian cancer, creating opportunities for targeting the FTE for ovarian cancer prevention. Preclinical evidence supports progestins as ovarian cancer preventives, but the effect of progestins on the FTE is not well characterized. The murine oviduct-specific glycoprotein promotor-driven simian virus 40 large T-Antigen (mogp-TAg) transgenic mouse model develops neoplastic lesions in the fallopian tube in a manner similar to that described in human fallopian tube and ovarian cancers. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effects of the progestin depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on fallopian tube carcinogenesis following treatment for 3 and 7 weeks in 5-week-old mogp-TAg mice. Overall, compared with vehicle-treated mice, the fallopian tube of DMPA-treated mice was significantly smaller (P < 0.0005), accumulated fewer p53-positive cells, had normal distribution of ciliated cells, less nuclear pleomorphism and epithelial tufting, and had a significantly lower proliferative index (P = 0.001). Accumulation of p53 signatures and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STIC) in the fallopian tube was significantly reduced in the DMPA (P < 0.0005) treatment group. Moreover, the fallopian tube of the DMPA-treated mice developed significantly less adenocarcinoma compared with vehicle (P < 0.005) at both treatment time points. DMPA treatment significantly induced cleaved caspase-3 (P < 0.0005) in the FTE compared with vehicle suggesting that apoptosis is involved in DMPA-related clearance of abnormal cells from the fallopian tube. These data demonstrate that DMPA targets early events in fallopian tube carcinogenesis by clearing genetically damaged cells, leading to marked reduction in adenocarcinoma, supporting progestins as chemopreventive agents for fallopian tube and ovarian cancers. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: The fallopian tube is thought to harbor the cell of origin for most ovarian cancers. We show in a mouse model of fallopian tube cancer that progestin eradicates the earliest known precancerous lesions and markedly inhibits fallopian tube carcinogenesis, adding to growing preclinical evidence supporting progestins as potent ovarian cancer chemopreventive agents.

Prospective feasibility study of neoadjuvant dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin with bevacizumab therapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) with bevacizumab therapy for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: Ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer patients with stage III-IV disease received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) every 3 weeks consisting of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15; carboplatin (AUC 6.0 mg/mL × min.) on day 1; and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) was performed after 3 cycles of dose-dense TC-bevacizumab therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete resection by IDS. Secondary endpoints were treatment completion rate, treatment exposure, response rate to NAC, adverse events, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included in this study. The median age was 55.5 years (37-80 years), and most patients had high-grade serous carcinoma accounted (n = 18). IDS was performed in all patients with complete resection achieved in 75% (95% confidence interval: 57.7-92.3%). The lower limit exceeded the preset threshold rate of 55%. The response rate to NAC was 79%, and serum CA125 levels were in the normal range after NAC in 57% of patients. Grade 4 hematological toxicities and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities occurred in 29% and 17% of patients during NAC, respectively. Grade 3/4 perioperative complications were seen in 29% of patients, but no gastrointestinal perforations or treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant dose-dense TC-bevacizumab therapy was well tolerated, and a satisfactory rate of complete resection by IDS was achieved.

Eficacia y seguridad de olaparib como terapia de mantenimiento en mujeres adultas con cáncer de ovario epitelial avanzado, de trompas de falopio o peritoneal primario con mutación de brca de línea germinal o somática que presentan respuesta completa o parcial a la quimioterapia basada en platino de primera línea que no recibieron bevacizumab / Efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy in adult women with somatic or germline BRCA-mutated advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who have a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy who did not receive bevacizumab

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el cual expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de olaparib como terapia de mantenimiento en mujeres adultas con cáncer de ovario epitelial avanzado, de trompas de Falopio o peritoneal primario con mutación de BRCA de línea germinal o somática que presentan respuesta completa o parcial a la quimioterapia basada en platino de primera línea que no recibieron bevacizumab. Así, el Dr. Miguel Ticona Castro, médico oncólogo del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016, envía al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI, la solicitud de uso fuera del petitorio del producto olaparib. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva en las bases de datos PubMed, The Cochrane Library y LILACS. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual dentro de las páginas web pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), incluyendo la National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), Instituto de Calidad y Eficiencia en la Atención de la Salud (IQWiG, por sus siglas en alemán), Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), el Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), el Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI), Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC) , Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Además, se realizó una búsqueda de GPC de las principales sociedades o instituciones especializadas en oncología y ginecología oncológica, tales como: la American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM), y la International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda adicional en la página web de registro de ensayos clínicos (EC) www.clinicaltrials.gov, para identificar EC en curso o que no hayan sido publicados aún. La búsqueda de literatura se limitó a GPC, ETS, revisiones sistemáticas (RS) con metaanálisis de ECA de fase III y ECA de fase III. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica (hasta diciembre de 2021), se incluyeron 5 GPC desarrolladas por la NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2021), la ASCO (Tew et al. 2020), la Cancer Care Ontario (Hirte et al. 2021), la ESMO (Colombo et al. 2019) y la SEOM (Redondo et al. 2021); así como 3 ETS realizadas por CADTH, NICE e IQWiG (Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care 2019, The CADTH pan- Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) 2019, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2019), y un ensayo clínico aleatorizado (ECA) de fase III de doble ciego denominado SOLO-1 (NCT01844986) con tres publicaciones de un análisis interino (Moore et al. 2018), de calidad de vida (Friedlander et al. 2021) y una con seguimiento hasta cinco años de seguimiento (Banerjee et al. 2021). CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación aprueba el uso de olaparib como terapia de mantenimiento en mujeres adultas con cáncer de ovario epitelial avanzado, de trompas de Falopio o peritoneal primario con mutación de BRCA de línea germinal o somática que presentan respuesta completa o parcial a la quimioterapia basada en platino de primera línea que no recibieron bevacizumab. La vigencia del presente dictamen es de un año y se debe asegurar un sistema de farmacovigilancia intensiva de los pacientes que lleguen a usar olaparib, según lo establecido en el Anexo N° 1. Asimismo, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de mayor evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

The outcome of patients with serous papillary peritoneal cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and epithelial ovarian cancer by treatment eras: 27 years data from the SEER registry.

AIM: To determine the differential effect of the treatment periods on the survival of patients with stage IV serous papillary peritoneal carcinoma (SPPC), fallopian tube cancers, and epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). METHODS: This was an exploratory, population-based observational study of all patients with stage IV SPPC, fallopian tube cancers, and EOC collected from the SEER Research Data 1973-2017. The study period was divided into three time-periods: platinum combinations before the taxane era (1990-1995), platinum plus taxane chemotherapy era (1996-2013), and bevacizumab era (2014-2017). RESULTS: A total of 9828 patients were eligible for analyses: SPPC (3898 patients; 39.7%), fallopian tube cancers (1290 patients; 13.1%) and EOC (4640 patients, 47.2%). In the 1990-1995 era, the 3-year cause-specific survival was 40% for SPPC, 53% for fallopian tube cancers, and 40% for POC. In the following era 1993-2013, the 3-year cause-specific survival increased to 55% for SPPC, 74% for fallopian tube cancers, and 45% for POC. The last era 2014-2017 showed a 3-year cause-specific survival of 64%, 67%, and 45% for patients with SPPC, fallopian tube cancers, and POC, respectively. The differences in cause-specific survival were statistically significant for patients with SPPC (p=0.004). Multivariable analysis showed that the treatment eras and age at diagnosis were associated with cause-specific survival. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are hypothesis-generating and cannot be considered conclusive given the inherent limitations of registry analysis. Subgroup analyses of the phase III randomized controlled trials, by tumor subset (EOC, fallopian tube cancer, and SPPC) would shed more light on the differential effects of novel therapies.

Disparities between Uptake of Germline BRCA1/2 Gene Tests and Implementation of Post-test Management Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: To assess the rate of germline BRCA gene tests in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and uptake of post-test risk management strategies in BRCA1/2-mutated patients. METHODS: Institutional databases were searched to identify patients who were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC) between 2009 and 2019 in two academic hospitals. Retrospective review on medical records was performed to collect clinico-pathologic variables, including performance of germline BRCA gene test and its results, as well as conduct of breast cancer screening tests and cascade testing. If annual mammography +/- breast ultrasonography was performed, it was considered that regular breast cancer surveillance was done. RESULTS: A total of 840 women with EOC were identified during the study period. Of these, 454 patients (54.0%) received BRCA gene testing and 106 patients (106/454, 23.3%) were positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. The rate of BRCA tests has markedly increased from 25.8% in 2009-2012 to 62.7% in 2017-2019. Among the 93 patients with BRCA1/2 mutation without previous personal breast cancer history, 20 patients (21.5%) received annual mammography with or without breast ultrasonography for regular surveillance. Among the 106 BRCA1/2-mutated EOC patients, cascade testing on family members was performed only in 13 patients (12.3%). CONCLUSION: Although BRCA1/2 gene tests have been substantially expanded, the uptake of post-test risk management strategies, including breast cancer screening for BRCA1/2-mutated patients and cascade testing for family members, has remained low. Strategies to increase its uptake and education about the importance of post-test risk managements are needed.

Pembrolizumab with low-dose carboplatin for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: survival and immune correlates.

BACKGROUND: Anti-programmed death 1 (PD1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies have shown modest activity as monotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Platinum chemotherapies induce T-cell proliferation and enhance tumor recognition. We assessed activity and safety of pembrolizumab with carboplatin in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I/II, single-arm clinical trial studied concurrent carboplatin and pembrolizumab in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Primary platinum refractory patients were excluded. Patients were treated after progression on subsequent non-platinum systemic therapy after becoming platinum resistant or refractory. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was given on day 1 and carboplatin area under the curve 2 on days 8 and 15 of a 3-week cycle until progression. Imaging was assessed by blinded independent review. PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed for CD3, CD4, CD8, PD1, CTLA4 and Ki67. RESULTS: The most common treatment-related adverse events were lymphopenia (18%) and anemia (9%) with most being grade 1 or 2 (93%). Of 29 patients treated, 23 patients were evaluable for best objective response: 10.3% (95% CI 2.2 to 27.4) had partial response (PR), 51.7% (95% CI 32.5 to 70.6) had stable disease (SD). 56.5% of patients had decreases in target lesions from baseline. All PD-L1-positive patients achieved PR (3/7, 42.8%) or SD (4/7, 57.2%). Median progression-free survival was 4.63 months (95% CI 4.3 to 4.96). Median OS was 11.3 months (95% CI 6.094 to 16.506). Peripheral CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells expanded after 3 (p=0.0015) and 5 (p=0.0023) cycles. CTLA4+PD1+CD8+ T cells decreased through the course of treatment up to the 12th cycle (p=0.004). When stratified by ratio of peripheral CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells to tumor burden at baseline, patients with a ratio ≥0.0375 who had a significantly longer median OS of 18.37 months compared with those with a ratio <0.0375 who had a median OS of 8.72 months (p=0.0099). No survival advantage was seen with stratification by tumor burden alone (p=0.24) or by CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells alone (p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab with carboplatin was well-tolerated and active in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. A ratio of peripheral T-cell exhaustion to radiographic tumor burden may identify patients more likely to benefit from this chemoimmunotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03029598.